AN ANALYSIS OF SINO INDIAN RELATIONS MODUS OPERANDI OR MODUS VIVENDI

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03      10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03      Published : Jun 2018
Authored by : AsgharAli , NazimRahim , Ghulam HussainAbidSipra

03 Pages : 24-32

References

  • Ahlawat, D., & Hughes, L. (2018). India-China Stand-off in Doklam: Aligning Realism with National Characteristics. The Round Table, 107(5), 613-625.
  • Aljazeera. (2019). UN Security Council to meet on Kashmir on China's request. Retrieved from
  • Awan, Z.A. (2019). Alice Wells Remarks on CPEC are worth considerations. Geopolitica.ur. Retrieved from
  • Bley, B. (2019). The New Geography of Global Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from
  • Britannica Encyclopedia. (2014a). Malacca, Strait of. Encyclopedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.
  • Britannica Encyclopedia. (2014b). Spice trade. Encyclopedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.
  • Congress Research Service. (2018). China-India Great Power Competition in the Indian Ocean Region: Issues for Congress. Retrieved from
  • Das, R.N. (2011). Sino-Indian Relations: Contours and Contents. Jindal Journal of International Affairs 1(1), 259-268.
  • Das, S. (2014). The Sino-Indian Border Dispute: what role for the European Union? European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS) Briefing Paper, EIAS: Brussels, 3
  • Dawn. (2016, May 23). Iran, India, Afghanistan sign transit accord on Chabahar port. Retrieved from
  • Einhorn, R., & Sidhu, W. P. S. (2017). The strategic chain linking Pakistan, India, China, and the United States. Brookings Institution.
  • Frankopan, P. (2018). The New Silk Roads: The Present and Future of the World. Bloomsbury Publishing
  • Gettleman, J., Raj, S., Schultz, K., & Kumar, H. (2019). India Revokes Kashmir's Special Status, Raising Fear of Unrest. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  • Gilpin, R. (2016). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
  • India.com. (2017). What is Panchsheel Pact? All You Need to Know. Retrieved from
  • qbal, A. (2016). US-Indian defense pact to impact Pakistan, China. Dawn. Retrieved from
  • Iqbal, M. Z., & Amin, M. (2016). Vacillation between Soft and Hard Balancing: China- Pakistan versus Indo-US Strategies. Strategic Studies, 36(1).
  • Jaipragas, B. (2017). Why is the US calling Asia-Pacific the Indo-Pacific? Donald Trump to 'clarify'. This Week in Asia. Retrieved from
  • Jiangtao, S., & Zhou, L. (2017). Wary China on 'Quad' bloc watch after officials from US, Japan, India and Australia meet on Asean sidelines. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from
  • Joseph, J. (2018). What is the Doklam issue all about? The Hindu. Retrieved from
  • Kazmi, S. (2017). Opposition to CPEC: A lost cause for India. Foreign Policy News. Retrieved from
  • Kenny, S. (2015). China and India: A New Great Game founded on historic mistrust and current competition. Centre for Defense and Strategic Studies, 1-20.
  • Khan, I. (2019, September 27). PM Imran Khan Complete Speech at UN General Assembly [video file]. Retrieved from
  • Lal, R. (2006). Understanding China and India: Security implications for the United States and the world. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Luk, U. H. (2016). Strategic ambiguities in Indian nuclear doctrine: Implications for Pakistan's security. Institute of Policy Studies Islamabad, Policy perspective, 13(1), 5-23.
  • Mahan, A. T. (2011). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783. Read Books Ltd.
  • Mark, J.J. (2012. Ancient China. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from
  • Myers, S.L., Barry, E., & Fisher, M. (2017). How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  • Nadeem, M. (2018). IS GWADAR THE ANSWER TO CHINA'S MALACCA DILEMMA? Gwadar Central. Retrieved from
  • Pandit. R.(2015). India reclaims spice route to counter China's silk route. Times of India. Retrieved from
  • Siddiqi, F. H. (2012). India-China Relations in the 21 st Century: Impact on Regional and Global Politics. Pakistan Horizon, 65(2), 59-72.
  • Storey, I. (2006). China's Malacca Dilemma. The Jamestown Foundation, Global Research & Analysis. Retrieved from
  • The Economic Times. (2016). Sagarmala project to be completed in 5 years. Retrieved from
  • The Indian Express. (2016, September 29). SAARC summit postponed after India's boycott: reports. Retrieved from
  • The Times of India. (2018, March 07). India-China bilateral trade hits historical high of $84.44 billion in 2017. Retrieved from
  • Thubron, C. (2012). Shadow of the Silk Road. Random House.
  • Toppa, S. (2018). Why Young Pakistanis and Learning Chinese. The Atlantic. Retrieved from
  • Trumbull, R. (1979). India's Visit to China Cut Off in Protest. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  • World Bank. (2018). Belt and Road Initiative. Retrieved from
  • Zhang, H., & Li, M. (2013). Sino-Indian border disputes. ISPI, Analysis, (181), 1-9.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. 2018. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III (I): 24-32 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03
    HARVARD : ALI, A., RAHIM, N. & SIPRA, G. H. A. 2018. An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi. Global Political Review, III, 24-32.
    MHRA : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. 2018. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III: 24-32
    MLA : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III.I (2018): 24-32 Print.
    OXFORD : Ali, Asghar, Rahim, Nazim, and Sipra, Ghulam Hussain Abid (2018), "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi", Global Political Review, III (I), 24-32
    TURABIAN : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review III, no. I (2018): 24-32. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03