AN ASSESSMENT OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM TO EMPOWER THE PEOPLE A CASE OF PAKISTAN 20072013

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).09      10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).09      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Muhammad Ikramullah Khan , Muhammad Shafiq

09 Pages : 79-91

References

  • Ahmad, S., S. (2012). The Judiciary of Pakistan and its Role in Political Crises. Royal Book Company, Karachi- Pakistan.
  • Cheema, M. H. & Gilani, I. S. (2015). The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005- 2013, Oxford University Press, Pakistan, p.330.
  • Hussain, F. (1993). Public Interest Litigation, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Working Paper Series#5, Islamabad, 1- 6.
  • In the supreme court of Pakistan, Original jurisdiction, suo motu case no.5, 2010, www.supremcourt.gov.pk
  • Khan, H. (2009). Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Karachi, p.487.
  • Magsi, A. A. (2011). Balance of power at the centre: The president, Prime Minister and Parliament. In, Nuri, M. H., Hanif, M. and Khan, M.N. (Etd.), Eighteenth Amendment Revisited, Islamabad Policy Research Institute, (IPRI) and Hanns Seidel Foundation (HSF), Islamabad, p.68.
  • Malik, N. & Rana, H. (2019). The History of Local Governance in Pakistan: What Lessons to Learn? Journal of International Politics, 1(3), 26-35.
  • Mirza, S. B. (2015). The Chaudhry Doctrine: A ‘Small-C Constitutional' Perspective. In Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005-2013, (33-75), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
  • Munir, K. & Khalid, I. (2018). Judicial activism in Pakistan: A case study of Supreme Court judgements 2008-2013. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 33(2), 321-334.
  • Niaz, I. (2020). The Commonwealth. Journal of International Affairs, 109(1). www.tandfonline.com
  • PLD, 2013, SC 1. (2013). www.pakistanconstitutionlaw.com/pld-2013- sc-1/
  • Provisional Constitutional Order. (2007 November 4) Dawn.com. https://www.dawn.com/news/274269/provi sional-constitutional-order
  • Rajshree, R. (2012). Pakistan's Judicial Renaissance: A New Phase, ISAS Insights No.166, Singapore, p.1-7.
  • Rizvi. & Gilani. (2013). The First 10 General Elections of Pakistan, A story Pakistan's Transition from Democracy Above Rule of Law to Democracy Under Rule of Law: 1970-2013, Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT), Islamabad, p.33-35.
  • Sadan, E. (1997). Empowerment and Community Planning: Theory and Practice of People- Focused Social Solutions. Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishers, Tel Aviv, p.115, 144- 164. http//www.mpow.org/etis/sheva-sadan- empowerment.pdf.
  • Siddiqi, F. (2015). Public Interest Litigation: Predictable Continuity and Radical Departures. In, Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005- 2013, (pp.77-130), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
  • Syed, M. (2013). Peoples Role in Good Governance: A case study of Pakistan. IPRI Journal, 1, 117-124.
  • Text of Supreme Court order in Hajj Arrangements scam. (2011 April 10). The News. https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/3 14577-text-of-supreme-court-order-in-haj- corruption-case
  • Zaidi, T. W. (2015). A New Supreme Court: The Contribution of Chief Justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. In Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005-2013, (pp.3-31), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
  • Ahmad, S., S. (2012). The Judiciary of Pakistan and its Role in Political Crises. Royal Book Company, Karachi- Pakistan.
  • Cheema, M. H. & Gilani, I. S. (2015). The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005- 2013, Oxford University Press, Pakistan, p.330.
  • Hussain, F. (1993). Public Interest Litigation, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Working Paper Series#5, Islamabad, 1- 6.
  • In the supreme court of Pakistan, Original jurisdiction, suo motu case no.5, 2010, www.supremcourt.gov.pk
  • Khan, H. (2009). Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Karachi, p.487.
  • Magsi, A. A. (2011). Balance of power at the centre: The president, Prime Minister and Parliament. In, Nuri, M. H., Hanif, M. and Khan, M.N. (Etd.), Eighteenth Amendment Revisited, Islamabad Policy Research Institute, (IPRI) and Hanns Seidel Foundation (HSF), Islamabad, p.68.
  • Malik, N. & Rana, H. (2019). The History of Local Governance in Pakistan: What Lessons to Learn? Journal of International Politics, 1(3), 26-35.
  • Mirza, S. B. (2015). The Chaudhry Doctrine: A ‘Small-C Constitutional' Perspective. In Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005-2013, (33-75), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
  • Munir, K. & Khalid, I. (2018). Judicial activism in Pakistan: A case study of Supreme Court judgements 2008-2013. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 33(2), 321-334.
  • Niaz, I. (2020). The Commonwealth. Journal of International Affairs, 109(1). www.tandfonline.com
  • PLD, 2013, SC 1. (2013). www.pakistanconstitutionlaw.com/pld-2013- sc-1/
  • Provisional Constitutional Order. (2007 November 4) Dawn.com. https://www.dawn.com/news/274269/provi sional-constitutional-order
  • Rajshree, R. (2012). Pakistan's Judicial Renaissance: A New Phase, ISAS Insights No.166, Singapore, p.1-7.
  • Rizvi. & Gilani. (2013). The First 10 General Elections of Pakistan, A story Pakistan's Transition from Democracy Above Rule of Law to Democracy Under Rule of Law: 1970-2013, Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT), Islamabad, p.33-35.
  • Sadan, E. (1997). Empowerment and Community Planning: Theory and Practice of People- Focused Social Solutions. Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishers, Tel Aviv, p.115, 144- 164. http//www.mpow.org/etis/sheva-sadan- empowerment.pdf.
  • Siddiqi, F. (2015). Public Interest Litigation: Predictable Continuity and Radical Departures. In, Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005- 2013, (pp.77-130), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.
  • Syed, M. (2013). Peoples Role in Good Governance: A case study of Pakistan. IPRI Journal, 1, 117-124.
  • Text of Supreme Court order in Hajj Arrangements scam. (2011 April 10). The News. https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/3 14577-text-of-supreme-court-order-in-haj- corruption-case
  • Zaidi, T. W. (2015). A New Supreme Court: The Contribution of Chief Justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. In Moeen H. Cheema and Ijaz Shafi Gilani, (Eds.), The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court 2005-2013, (pp.3-31), Oxford University Press, Pakistan.

Cite this article

    APA : Khan, M. I., & Shafiq, M. (2021). An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013). Global Political Review, VI(II), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).09
    CHICAGO : Khan, Muhammad Ikramullah, and Muhammad Shafiq. 2021. "An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013)." Global Political Review, VI (II): 79-91 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).09
    HARVARD : KHAN, M. I. & SHAFIQ, M. 2021. An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013). Global Political Review, VI, 79-91.
    MHRA : Khan, Muhammad Ikramullah, and Muhammad Shafiq. 2021. "An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013)." Global Political Review, VI: 79-91
    MLA : Khan, Muhammad Ikramullah, and Muhammad Shafiq. "An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013)." Global Political Review, VI.II (2021): 79-91 Print.
    OXFORD : Khan, Muhammad Ikramullah and Shafiq, Muhammad (2021), "An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013)", Global Political Review, VI (II), 79-91
    TURABIAN : Khan, Muhammad Ikramullah, and Muhammad Shafiq. "An Assessment of Judicial Activism to Empower the People: A Case of Pakistan (2007-2013)." Global Political Review VI, no. II (2021): 79-91. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).09