References

• A. Lanham, (1991). A Handbook of Rhetorical Terms, 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
• Allen, J. (1991). Thematic Repetition as Rhetorical Technique. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 21(1), 29-40.
• BATSTONE, R. (1995). Grammar in Discourse: Attitude and Deniability. In G. Cook and B Seidlhofer, (eds.) Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197-213.
• Billig, M. (199l). Ideology and Opinions: studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. 1979. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 97-109.
• Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. 1990. Deeds done in words: presidential rhetoric and the genres of governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Chaffee, S. H. ed 1975. Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Dillon, G. L., Doyle, A., Eastman, C. M., Kline, S., Silberstein, S., & Toolan, M. (WAUDAG). 1990. The Rhetorical Construction of a President. Discourse and Society 1(2),189-200.
• Dutton, K. (2011). Flipnosis: the art of split-second persuasion. Random House.
• Edelman, M. J. 1985. The symbolic uses ofpolitics. Second Edition. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
• FAIRCLOUGH, N. 1993. Discourse and Social Change, London: Polity Press.
• FAIRCLOUGH, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Longman
• Foss, Sonja K. (1996). Rhetorical Criticism Exploration and Practice Second Edition.Illinois:Waveland Press, Inc.
• Gamson, W. A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Graber, D. A. 1981. Political languages. In: D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (eds). Handbook of Political communication: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 195-223.
• Harris, S. 1991. Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (ed) Broadcast talk: London: Sage, 76-99.
• Holly, W. 1990. Politikersprache. Inszenierungen und Rollenkonflikte im informellen Sprachhandeln eines Bundestagsabgeordneten. Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Li, J., & Zhan, L. (2011). Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM: Evidence from consumer-generated product reviews. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 239-257.
• Murthy, D. M. (2014). A study on aristotle's rhetoric. p. 251.
• Okulska, Urszula, and Piotr Cap. 2010. Analysis of political discourse: landmarks, challenges, and prospects. Perspectives in politics and discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska and Piotr Cap's, Amsterdam: John Bejamins, 3- 22.
• Oxford Analytica (2020). Pakistan will have to rely more on IMF. Emerald Expert Briefings, (oxan-db).
• Perloff, R. (2003) The Dynamics of Persuasion. Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
• Schaffner, C. (1996)
• Shell, G. R., & Moussa, M. (2007). The art of woo: Using strategic persuasion to sell your ideas. Penguin
• Swanson, D. L., & Nimmo, D. D., eds. 1990. New directions in political communication: a resource book. London: Sage.
• Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis: In search of meaning. Sage.
• van Dijk, T. A. 1987. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. van Dijk, T. A. 1988. The Tamil panic in the press. In T. A. van Dijk, News Analysis. Case studies of international and national news in the press: Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 215-254.