References

• Albonetti, C. A. (1987). Prosecutorial Discretion: The Effects of Uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053523.
• Brown, M. P., & Bunnell, S. E. (2005). Negotiating Justice: Prosecutorial Perspectives on Federal Plea Bargaining in the District of Columbia. American Criminal Law Review 43(3).
• Feng, C., Nelson, L. P., & Simon, T. W. (2016). China's Changing Legal System: Lawyers and Judges on Civil and Criminal Law. The China Quarterly, 227, 820-822. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574101600085 0.
• Fukurai, H. (2013). A step in the Right Direction for Japan's Judicial Reform: Impact of the Justice System Reform Council (JSRC) Recommendations on Criminal Justice and Citizen Participation in Criminal, Civil and Administrative Litigation. Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rew. 36(2), 518-557.
• Green, B. A. (2019). Prosecutorial Discretion: The Difficulty and Necessity of Public Inquiry. Dickinson Law Review, 123, 589-624.
• Howell, B. (2014). Prosecutorial Discretion the Duty to Seek Justice in an Overburdened Criminal Justice System. The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 27, 285-313. https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/
• Typically, opinion refers to advice given by a barrister about the facts of a case, or a legal memorandum prepared by a solicitor and given to the barrister. https://www.lawprose.org/lawprose-lesson- 165-ruling-vs-opinion-vs-judgment-etc
• Inagawa, T. (1995). The Criminal Justice System in Japan: Investigation and Prosecution, Tokyo: UNAFEI.
• Ishimatsu, T. (1989). Are Criminal Defendants in Japan Truly Receiving Trials by Judges? Law in Japan, 22, 143-153
• Jackson, R.H. (1940). The Federal Prosecutor. Journal of the American Judicature Society, 24, 18-20.
• Jehle, J., & Wade, M. (2006). Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power across Europe. Springer.
• Johnson, D. T. (2012). Japan's Prosecution System. Crime and Justice, 41(1), 35-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/665409.
• Karim, F. (2020). Access to justice in Pakistan, Karachi: Pakistan Law House, 2nd Edition
• Langer, M. (2005). From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal, 45, 1-64.
• Lidstone, K. W (1987-10). The reformed prosecution process in England: a radical reform?. Criminal Law Journal, 11 (5), 296- 318.
• Runciman, W. G. (1993). Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (Report 2263 ed.). HM Stationery Office.
• Spencer, J. R. (2006). The Code of Criminal Procedure of France. 1-278. https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/ 6381/file/France_CPC_am2006_en.pdf.
• Strasbourg Council of Europe, (1997). The report of the Committee of Experts on the role of the Public Prosecution in the Criminal Justice System commissioned by the European Committee on Crime Problems. Strasbourg PC-PR (97) 1 Rev. 3.
• Taleb, A., & Ahlstrand, T. (2011). The public prosecutor, its role, duties and powers in the pretrial stage of the criminal justice process ? a comparative study of the french and the Swedish legal systems ? International Review of Penal Law, 82(3), 523-540. https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.823.0523.
• The Code of Conduct for Crown Prosecutors.
• The Code of Criminal Procedure of Japan.
• The People's Procuratorates of the People's Republic of China.
• Walker, S. (1993). Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press
• West, M. D. (1992). Prosecution Review Commissions: Japan's Answer to the Problem of Prosecutorial Discretion. Columbia Law Review, 92(3), 684-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122957.