INSANITY AS A LEGAL DEFENSE FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2017(II-I).15      10.31703/gpr.2017(II-I).15      Published : Dec 1
Authored by : MuhammadSirajKhan , NomanGul , NaghmaFarid

15 Pages : 142-151

References

  • Salmond, John. (1913). Jurisprudence. London: Stevens and Haynes.
  • Dine and Gobert.(1993). Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (2008).Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
  • Keeton, G.W. (1961). Guilty But Insane. London: Macdonald and Co.
  • Nigam, R. C. (1965).Law of Crimes in India: Vol: I. New York: Asia Publishing House.
  • Pearlstein, Stanley. (1986). Forensic Psychiatry and Legal Protections of the Insane. New York: Oceana Publications, Inc.
  • Reid, Sue Titus. (1998). Criminal Law. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Thomas, Charles and Bishop, Donna M. (1987).Criminal Law. California: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Wayne & Austin. (1986).Criminal Law. (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
  • Durham v. United States, 214 F. 2d 862 (D.C.Cir. 1954).
  • People v. Ramsey, 375 N. W.2d 297 (Mich. 1985).
  • State v. Young, 853 P.2d 327 (Utah 1993).
  • United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (D.C.Cir. 1972).
  • The Homicide Act, 1957.
  • The Model Penal Code, 1962 available online at

References

  • Salmond, John. (1913). Jurisprudence. London: Stevens and Haynes.
  • Dine and Gobert.(1993). Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (2008).Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
  • Keeton, G.W. (1961). Guilty But Insane. London: Macdonald and Co.
  • Nigam, R. C. (1965).Law of Crimes in India: Vol: I. New York: Asia Publishing House.
  • Pearlstein, Stanley. (1986). Forensic Psychiatry and Legal Protections of the Insane. New York: Oceana Publications, Inc.
  • Reid, Sue Titus. (1998). Criminal Law. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Thomas, Charles and Bishop, Donna M. (1987).Criminal Law. California: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Wayne & Austin. (1986).Criminal Law. (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
  • Durham v. United States, 214 F. 2d 862 (D.C.Cir. 1954).
  • People v. Ramsey, 375 N. W.2d 297 (Mich. 1985).
  • State v. Young, 853 P.2d 327 (Utah 1993).
  • United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (D.C.Cir. 1972).
  • The Homicide Act, 1957.
  • The Model Penal Code, 1962 available online at

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khan, Muhammad Siraj, Noman Gul, and Naghma Farid. 2017. "Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective." Global Political Review, II (I): 142-151 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2017(II-I).15

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHAN, M. S., GUL, N. & FARID, N. 2017. Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective. Global Political Review, II, 142-151.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khan, Muhammad Siraj, Noman Gul, and Naghma Farid. 2017. "Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective." Global Political Review, II: 142-151

MLA

    MLA : Khan, Muhammad Siraj, Noman Gul, and Naghma Farid. "Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective." Global Political Review, II.I (2017): 142-151 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khan, Muhammad Siraj, Gul, Noman, and Farid, Naghma (2017), "Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective", Global Political Review, II (I), 142-151

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khan, Muhammad Siraj, Noman Gul, and Naghma Farid. "Insanity As A Legal Defense From A Historical Perspective." Global Political Review II, no. I (2017): 142-151. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2017(II-I).15