PERFECTION AND WORKING WOMEN FOUCAULDIAN DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF A PAKISTANI MORNING SHOW

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-I).16      10.31703/gpr.2020(V-I).16      Published : Mar 1
Authored by : Samina Noor , Razia Musarrat , Muhammad Ilyas Ansari

16 Pages : 135-144

References

  • Binkley, S. (2007). Governmentality and lifestyle studies. Sociology Compass, 1, 111-126.
  • Binkley, S. (2011). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4, 371-394.
  • Bondi, L. (2005). Working the spaces of neoliberal subjectivity: Psychotherapeutic technologies, professionalization and counseling. Antipode, 37(3), 497-514.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance. Against the new myths of our time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2 ed.). London: Routledge
  • Connolly, P. (1998). Racism,gendered identities and young children. London: Routledge.
  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern societ. London: Sage.
  • First Person: The beauty alchemist. (2011, 3 20). Dawn. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/614585
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Colle 'ge de France 1978-1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist time. Subjectivity, 25, 432-445.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
  • Hilgers, M. (2011). The three anthropological approaches to neoliberalism. International Social Science Journal, 61(202), 351-364.
  • Hochschild, A., & Garrett, S. (2011). Beyond Tocqueville's telescope: The personalized brand and the branded self. The Hedgehog Review: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture,, 13(3), 82-95.
  • Kasser, T. (2015). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 489-514.
  • Kasser, T., & Linn, S. (2016). Growing up under corporate capitalism: The problem of marketing to children, with suggestions for policy solutions. Social Issues & Policy Review, 10(1), 122-150.
  • Kasser, T., Cohn, S., & Ryan, R. (2007). Some costs of American. Psychological Inquir, 18, 1-22.
  • Kelan, E. (2008). Gender, risk and employment insecurity: The masculine breadwinner subtext. Human Relations, 61(9), 1171-1202.
  • Layton, L. (2010). Irrational exuberance: Neoliberal subjectivity and the perversion of truth. Subjectivity, 3, 303-322.
  • Lemke, T. (2001). 'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de. Economy & Society, 30(2), 190-207.
  • Madsen, J. (2014). The therapeutic turn. How psychology altered Western culture. London: Routledge.
  • Meng, W. (2017). During the last decade, neo-liberalism has remained one of the critical concerns. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci, 10(1), 455-458.
  • Nafstad, H. (2002). The neo-liberal ideology and the self-interest paradigm as resistance to change. Journal of Radical Psycholog, 3, 3-21.
  • Nafstad, H. (2005). Assumptions and values in the production of knowledge: Towards an area ethics of psychology and the social sciences. In R. S, & C. Katulushi , Values in higher education (pp. 150- 158). Vale of Glamorgan: Aureus Publishing.
  • Nafstad, H., & Blakar, R. (2012). Ideology and social psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 282-294.
  • O'Flynn, G., & Petersen, E. B. (2007). The 'good life' and the 'rich portfolio': Young women, schooling and neoliberal subjectification. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4), 459-472.
  • Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213-230.
  • Parker, I. (1999). Reflexive research and the grounding of analysis: Social psychology and the psycomplex. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4, 239.
  • Plehwe, d., Walpen, B., & Neunhöffer, G. (2006). Neoliberal hegemony -Global Critique. London: Routledge.
  • Prilleltensky, L. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist,, 44(5), 795-802.
  • Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25-36.
  • Roberts, P., & Peters, M. (2008). Neoliberalism, higher education and research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
  • Rose, N., O'Malle, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and, 2, 83-104.
  • Ventures, S. (n.d.). Naheed Ansari. Retrieved 11 8, 2019, from SEED VENTURES: http://seedventures.org/naheed-ansari/
  • Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender & Education,, 15(3), 237-248.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2006). Workers in the new economy: Transformation as border crossing. Ethos, 34(1), 10-41.
  • Willig, C. (2008). Discourse analysis. In J. A. Smith, Qualitative psychology: A practical (pp. 160-187). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Binkley, S. (2007). Governmentality and lifestyle studies. Sociology Compass, 1, 111-126.
  • Binkley, S. (2011). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4, 371-394.
  • Bondi, L. (2005). Working the spaces of neoliberal subjectivity: Psychotherapeutic technologies, professionalization and counseling. Antipode, 37(3), 497-514.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance. Against the new myths of our time. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2 ed.). London: Routledge
  • Connolly, P. (1998). Racism,gendered identities and young children. London: Routledge.
  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern societ. London: Sage.
  • First Person: The beauty alchemist. (2011, 3 20). Dawn. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/614585
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Colle 'ge de France 1978-1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gill, R. (2008). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist time. Subjectivity, 25, 432-445.
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
  • Hilgers, M. (2011). The three anthropological approaches to neoliberalism. International Social Science Journal, 61(202), 351-364.
  • Hochschild, A., & Garrett, S. (2011). Beyond Tocqueville's telescope: The personalized brand and the branded self. The Hedgehog Review: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture,, 13(3), 82-95.
  • Kasser, T. (2015). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 489-514.
  • Kasser, T., & Linn, S. (2016). Growing up under corporate capitalism: The problem of marketing to children, with suggestions for policy solutions. Social Issues & Policy Review, 10(1), 122-150.
  • Kasser, T., Cohn, S., & Ryan, R. (2007). Some costs of American. Psychological Inquir, 18, 1-22.
  • Kelan, E. (2008). Gender, risk and employment insecurity: The masculine breadwinner subtext. Human Relations, 61(9), 1171-1202.
  • Layton, L. (2010). Irrational exuberance: Neoliberal subjectivity and the perversion of truth. Subjectivity, 3, 303-322.
  • Lemke, T. (2001). 'The birth of bio-politics': Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de. Economy & Society, 30(2), 190-207.
  • Madsen, J. (2014). The therapeutic turn. How psychology altered Western culture. London: Routledge.
  • Meng, W. (2017). During the last decade, neo-liberalism has remained one of the critical concerns. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci, 10(1), 455-458.
  • Nafstad, H. (2002). The neo-liberal ideology and the self-interest paradigm as resistance to change. Journal of Radical Psycholog, 3, 3-21.
  • Nafstad, H. (2005). Assumptions and values in the production of knowledge: Towards an area ethics of psychology and the social sciences. In R. S, & C. Katulushi , Values in higher education (pp. 150- 158). Vale of Glamorgan: Aureus Publishing.
  • Nafstad, H., & Blakar, R. (2012). Ideology and social psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 282-294.
  • O'Flynn, G., & Petersen, E. B. (2007). The 'good life' and the 'rich portfolio': Young women, schooling and neoliberal subjectification. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4), 459-472.
  • Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213-230.
  • Parker, I. (1999). Reflexive research and the grounding of analysis: Social psychology and the psycomplex. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4, 239.
  • Plehwe, d., Walpen, B., & Neunhöffer, G. (2006). Neoliberal hegemony -Global Critique. London: Routledge.
  • Prilleltensky, L. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist,, 44(5), 795-802.
  • Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25-36.
  • Roberts, P., & Peters, M. (2008). Neoliberalism, higher education and research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
  • Rose, N., O'Malle, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and, 2, 83-104.
  • Ventures, S. (n.d.). Naheed Ansari. Retrieved 11 8, 2019, from SEED VENTURES: http://seedventures.org/naheed-ansari/
  • Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender & Education,, 15(3), 237-248.
  • Walkerdine, V. (2006). Workers in the new economy: Transformation as border crossing. Ethos, 34(1), 10-41.
  • Willig, C. (2008). Discourse analysis. In J. A. Smith, Qualitative psychology: A practical (pp. 160-187). Los Angeles: Sage.

Cite this article

    APA : Noor, S., Musarrat, R., & Ansari, M. I. (2020). Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show. Global Political Review, V(I), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-I).16
    CHICAGO : Noor, Samina, Razia Musarrat, and Muhammad Ilyas Ansari. 2020. "Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show." Global Political Review, V (I): 135-144 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2020(V-I).16
    HARVARD : NOOR, S., MUSARRAT, R. & ANSARI, M. I. 2020. Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show. Global Political Review, V, 135-144.
    MHRA : Noor, Samina, Razia Musarrat, and Muhammad Ilyas Ansari. 2020. "Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show." Global Political Review, V: 135-144
    MLA : Noor, Samina, Razia Musarrat, and Muhammad Ilyas Ansari. "Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show." Global Political Review, V.I (2020): 135-144 Print.
    OXFORD : Noor, Samina, Musarrat, Razia, and Ansari, Muhammad Ilyas (2020), "Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show", Global Political Review, V (I), 135-144
    TURABIAN : Noor, Samina, Razia Musarrat, and Muhammad Ilyas Ansari. "Perfection and Working Women: Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of a Pakistani Morning Show." Global Political Review V, no. I (2020): 135-144. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2020(V-I).16