References

• Ashcraft, R. (1986). Revolutionary politics and Locke's two treatises of government. Princeton. University Press
• Bickel, A. M. (1961). Foreword: passive virtues. Harv. L. Rev., 75, 40.
• Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986).
• Carey, G. W. (1978). Separation of Powers and the Madisonian Model: A Reply to the Critics. American Political Science Review, 72(1), 151-164.
• Chopper, J. (1980). Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court.
• Cutler, L. N. (1988). Some reflections about divided government. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 18(3), 485-492.
• Clair, S. P. (1989). Separation of Powers: A New Look at the Functionalist Approach. Case W. Res. L. Rev., 40, 331.
• Cohen, S. P. (2005). The Idea of Pakistan (Lahore).
• De Secondat Montesquieu, C. (1773). The spirit of laws (Vol. 2). J. Nourse and P. Vaillant.
• Eidelberg, P. (1968). The Philosophy of the American Constitution.
• Eskridge Jr, W. N. (1998). Relationships Between Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Powers Cases. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 22, 21.
• Greene, A. S. (1994). Checks and balances in an era of presidential lawmaking. The University of Chicago Law Review, 61(1), 123-196.
• Holmes Jr, O. W. (2009). The Common Law 113.
• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha, [1983] 462 U.S. 919
• Kurland, P. B. (1986). The Rise and Fall of the
• Khan, H. (2005). Constitutional and political history of Pakistan. Oxford University Press, USA.
• Levi, E. H. (1976). Some aspects of separation of powers. Columbia Law Review, 76(3), 371-391.
• Madison, James. The Federalist No. 47.
• Madison, James. The Federalist No. 51.
• Morrison v. Olson, [1988] 108 S. Ct. 2597
• Newberg, P. R. (2002). Judging the state: Courts and constitutional politics in Pakistan (No. 59). Cambridge University Press.
• Rossman, G. (1949). The Spirit of Laws: The Doctrine of Separation of Powers. American Bar Association Journal, 93-96.
• Strauss, P. L. (1984). The place of agencies in government: Separation of powers and the fourth branch. Columbia Law Review, 84(3), 573-669.
• Strauss, P. L. (1986). Formal and Functional Approaches to Separation of Powers Questions A Foolish Inconsistency. Cornell L. Rev., 72, 488.
• Sargentich, T. O. (1986). Contemporary debate about legislative-executive separation of powers. Cornell L. Rev., 72, 430.
• Sayyed Yousaf Raza Gailani v. the Registrar of the Supreme Court, [2012] SC 466 PLD
• Sultana, T. (2012). Montesquieu's doctrine of separation of powers: A case study of Pakistan. Journal of European Studies, 28(2).
• The Government of India Act 1858
• The Indian Councils Act 1861
• Thayer, J. B. (1893). The origin and scope of the American doctrine of constitutional law. Little, Brown.
• The Minto-Morely Reforms 1909
• The Government of India Act 1919
• Tansill, C. C. (1927). Documents Illustrative of the Formation of the Union of the American States (No. 398). U.S. Government Printing Office.
• The Government of India Act 1935
• The Constitution of Pakistan 1973
• United States v. Nixon, [1974] 418 U.S. 683.
• Vile, M. J. C. (2012). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Liberty Fund.
• Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, [1952]343 U.S. 579, 635 (1952).
• Ziring, L. (1997). Pakistan in the twentieth century: A political history. Oxford University Press, USA.