01 Pages : 1-8
References
- Dawn. (2020, March 7). Pakistan wins GSP-Plus extension. Dawn.
- Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan. (n.d.). EU-Pakistan Trade Data 2012. January 13, 2012, Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/pakistan/eu _pakistan/trade_relation/index_en.htm
- Directorate-General for Trade. (2010, November 18). EU-Pakistan WTO Waiver Request. European Commission: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/n ovember/tradoc_147026.pdf
- EEAS. (n.d.). EU Generalized System of Preferences. European External Action Service: http://www.europa-eu- un.org/articles/en/article_5520_en.htm
- EEAS. (n.d.). Pakistan and the EU. Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/pakistan/1 327/pakistan-and-eu_en
- European Commission. (n.d.). EU-Pakistan Trade. European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries- and-regions/countries/pakistan/
- Fakhar, H. (2005). The Political Economy of the EU GSP Scheme: Implications for Pakistan. In South Asian Yearbook of Trade and Development. New Delhi: Centre for Trade and Development.
- Ministry of Commerce, GoP. (n.d.). List of Conventions to qualify for 'GSP Plus'. https://www.commerce.gov.pk/wp- content/uploads/pdf/UN_conventions.pdf
- MOFA. (n.d.). Pakistan-EU Joint Commission. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, GoP: http://mofa.gov.pk/pakistan-eu-joint- commission/
- Pakistan Business Council. (2020). Pakistan's performance under the EU GSP Plus program: 2014-2019.
- Pakistan Business Council.
- Rana, S. (2021, February 25). FATF grey-listing caused '$38b losses. The Express Tribune.
- Sajjad, B. (2021, June 19). GSP conventions to be fully enforced: Foreign Minister Qureshi. Dawn.
- Schmid, V. A. (2011). Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. In D. Beland, & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 47-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schmidt, V. A. (2009). European Elites on the European Union: What Vision for the Future? In A. Gamble, & D. Lane (Eds.), The European Union and World Politics: Consensus and Division (pp. 257-73). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- World Bank. (n.d.). Country-Pakistan. World Integrated Trade Solution: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en /Country/PAK/Year/LTST/Summary
- Dawn. (2020, March 7). Pakistan wins GSP-Plus extension. Dawn.
- Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan. (n.d.). EU-Pakistan Trade Data 2012. January 13, 2012, Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/pakistan/eu _pakistan/trade_relation/index_en.htm
- Directorate-General for Trade. (2010, November 18). EU-Pakistan WTO Waiver Request. European Commission: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/n ovember/tradoc_147026.pdf
- EEAS. (n.d.). EU Generalized System of Preferences. European External Action Service: http://www.europa-eu- un.org/articles/en/article_5520_en.htm
- EEAS. (n.d.). Pakistan and the EU. Delegation of the European Union to Pakistan: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/pakistan/1 327/pakistan-and-eu_en
- European Commission. (n.d.). EU-Pakistan Trade. European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries- and-regions/countries/pakistan/
- Fakhar, H. (2005). The Political Economy of the EU GSP Scheme: Implications for Pakistan. In South Asian Yearbook of Trade and Development. New Delhi: Centre for Trade and Development.
- Ministry of Commerce, GoP. (n.d.). List of Conventions to qualify for 'GSP Plus'. https://www.commerce.gov.pk/wp- content/uploads/pdf/UN_conventions.pdf
- MOFA. (n.d.). Pakistan-EU Joint Commission. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, GoP: http://mofa.gov.pk/pakistan-eu-joint- commission/
- Pakistan Business Council. (2020). Pakistan's performance under the EU GSP Plus program: 2014-2019.
- Pakistan Business Council.
- Rana, S. (2021, February 25). FATF grey-listing caused '$38b losses. The Express Tribune.
- Sajjad, B. (2021, June 19). GSP conventions to be fully enforced: Foreign Minister Qureshi. Dawn.
- Schmid, V. A. (2011). Reconciling Ideas and Institutions through Discursive Institutionalism Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. In D. Beland, & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 47-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schmidt, V. A. (2009). European Elites on the European Union: What Vision for the Future? In A. Gamble, & D. Lane (Eds.), The European Union and World Politics: Consensus and Division (pp. 257-73). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- World Bank. (n.d.). Country-Pakistan. World Integrated Trade Solution: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en /Country/PAK/Year/LTST/Summary
Cite this article
-
APA : Shad, M. R. (2021). The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects. Global Political Review, VI(II), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).01
-
CHICAGO : Shad, Muhammad Riaz. 2021. "The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects." Global Political Review, VI (II): 1-8 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).01
-
HARVARD : SHAD, M. R. 2021. The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects. Global Political Review, VI, 1-8.
-
MHRA : Shad, Muhammad Riaz. 2021. "The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects." Global Political Review, VI: 1-8
-
MLA : Shad, Muhammad Riaz. "The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects." Global Political Review, VI.II (2021): 1-8 Print.
-
OXFORD : Shad, Muhammad Riaz (2021), "The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects", Global Political Review, VI (II), 1-8
-
TURABIAN : Shad, Muhammad Riaz. "The GSP+ Status of Pakistan in the European Union: Challenges and Prospects." Global Political Review VI, no. II (2021): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).01