http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).05
10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).05
Published : Jun 2018
Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan
Pakistan needs reforms in electoral institutions inherited from the colonial era which have minimal roots in its diverse soil led to political wrangling in federating units for more representational space in the federal structure. Conflict management through the engineering of an inclusive electoral system in Pakistan is the aim of this paper. The challenge of changing demographics and the demand for a fair share in power can be met with the introduction of a suitable reform package as set forth by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its verdict in June 2012. With this decision in view, this paper attempts to examine a feasible way to introduce a less perilous electoral packa
-
Alternative Vote (AV), Electoral Globalization, Colonial Plantation, Regional Imitation, Preferential Vote (PV)
-
(1) Lubna Batool
Lecturer,Department of Political Science,University of Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Manzoor Ahmad
Assistant Professor,Department of Political Science, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Syed Ali Shah
Assistant Professor, Department of Pakistan Studies, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
- Ali, A. (2009, December 23). Development Pakistan: Federalism and Provincial Autonomy [Blog Post]. Retrieved from http://developmentpakistan.blogspot.com/2009/12/federalism-and-provincialautonomy.html
- Arms, D.G. (1997). Fiji's Proposed New Voting System: A Critique with Counter-Proposals. In Brij V. Lal and Larmour, P. (Eds.). Electoral Systems in Divided Societies: the Fiji Constitution Review. Canberra: the Australian National University/Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, p.114.
- Bastian, S. & Luckham, R. (Eds.). (2003). Can Democracy Be Designed? The Politics of Constitutional Choice in Conflict Torn Societies. New York: Zed Books. Available at https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=xJgBroRWX_MC
- Cox, G. (1999). Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination. Annual Review of Political Science 2, pp.145- 61.
- Bogaards, M. (2001 April). Electoral Choices for Divided Societies: Moderation through Constituency Pooling and Vote Pooling. Paper prepared for the 29th Joint Sessions of Workshops 6-11, in Grenoble, France Workshop on http://aceproject.org/ero-en/topics/elections-security/bogaards.pdf
- Electoral System in Pakistan. (n. d). Pakistan Visionary Forum, Retrieved from http:// dimensionscommunications.com/PVF-2/assets/reports/report-electoral-system-in-pakistan.pdf
- Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 96. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.pk
- Horowitz, D. L. (n.d). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Retrieved from https://pestuge.iliauni.edu.ge/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/Horowitz-Donald-L.-Ethnic-Groups-in-Conflict.pdf:
- Hudler, E. (2013, May 24). Pakistan- Peaceful Transition but Winer-Take-All Failure. Fairvote. Retrieved from https://www.fairvote.org/pakistan-peaceful-transitions-but-winner-take-all-failure
- Huntington, P. S. (1991). Democracy's Third Wave. Journal of Democracy. 2 (2), 12. Retrieved from https://www.ned.org/docs/Samuel-P-Huntington-Democracy-Third-Wave.pdf
- Lewis, W. A. (1965). Politics in West Africa. London: George Allen & Unwin, p.71. See also Lijphart, A. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp.143-7.
- Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Society. New York: Yale University Press.
- Nohlen, D. (1984). Two Incompatible Principles of Representation. In Lijphart, A. & Grofman, B. (Eds.). Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. New York: Praeger, pp.83-89. Retrieved from http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/R16 Lijphart and Grofman. 1984. Introduction. In Choosing an Electoral....pdf
- Pakistan Election 2018. (2018, July 30). Dunya News, Retrieved from https://dunyanews.tv/en/ Pakistan/450005-Pakistan-election-result-2018-final-list-ECP-PTI-wins-PMLN-PPP
- Reilly, B. (2002). Electoral System for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy. 13 (2). Pp. 156-70. Retrieved from https://devpolicy.crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/ staff/ben_reilly/ReillyB_04.pdf
- Reilly, Benjamin, (2004). The global spread of preferential voting: Australian institutional imperialism? Australian Journal of Political Science. 39. (2), 257. Retrieved from https://crawford.anu.edu.au/pdf/staff/ben_reilly/breilly8.pdf
- Report of 7th Youth Parliament of Pakistan. (2016, February). PILDAT. Retrieved from http://youthparliament.pk/uploads/public/b73486668f4be3df39d5395221e22e04.pdf
- Reynolds, A. & Reilly, B. (Eds.). (1997). The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp.9-14. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/esd_english_0.pdf
- Sartori, G. (1968). Political Development and Political Engineering. In Montgomery, J. and Hirschmann, A. O. (Eds.). Public Policy 17. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 273.
- Satori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives sand Outcomes. New York: New York University, p. 114.
- Santiso, C. 1998. 'International Dimensions.' In Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, Eds P. Harris and B. Reilly. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Retrieved from http://eprpinformation.org/files/peaceprocesses/negotiations /ddrc_options-for-negociators-1of4.pdf
- See for detail electronic copy of Royal commission Report on electoral Reforms of New Zealand 1986, (19860. Retrieved from https://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/reportroyal-commission-electoral-system-1986 https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/fpp-to-mmp
- The Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System. (1988). Jenkins Commission 1998. London: Stationery Office. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Dell 5000/Downloads/RP98- 112.pdf
Cite this article
-
APA : Batool, L., Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. A. (2018). Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan. Global Political Review, III(I), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).05
-
CHICAGO : Batool, Lubna, Manzoor Ahmad, and Syed Ali Shah. 2018. "Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan." Global Political Review, III (I): 44-55 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).05
-
HARVARD : BATOOL, L., AHMAD, M. & SHAH, S. A. 2018. Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan. Global Political Review, III, 44-55.
-
MHRA : Batool, Lubna, Manzoor Ahmad, and Syed Ali Shah. 2018. "Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan." Global Political Review, III: 44-55
-
MLA : Batool, Lubna, Manzoor Ahmad, and Syed Ali Shah. "Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan." Global Political Review, III.I (2018): 44-55 Print.
-
OXFORD : Batool, Lubna, Ahmad, Manzoor, and Shah, Syed Ali (2018), "Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan", Global Political Review, III (I), 44-55
-
TURABIAN : Batool, Lubna, Manzoor Ahmad, and Syed Ali Shah. "Engineering Electoral Design in Terms of Globalization of Institutions: A Case Study of Pakistan." Global Political Review III, no. I (2018): 44-55. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).05