- Ahmad, A. (2015). Gwadar Port: Potentials and Prospects, Report, Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies, Islamabad, n.d.
- Ahmadani, A. (2014). China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: PM Approves Over $38bn Projects. Daily Times (Lahore).
- Bird, J. (1969). Traffic flows to and from British seaports, Geography, 54, 284-301.
- Bird, J. (1984). Seaport development: some questions of scale, in Hoyle, B.S., Hilling, D. (Eds), Seaport Systems and Spatial Change, Chichester: Wiley, 21-41.
- Brocard, M., Joly, O. & Steck, B. (1995). Les Réseaux De Circulation Maritime, Mappemonde, 37(1),
- Clark, X., Dollar, D. & Micco, A. (2004). Port Efficiency, Maritime Transport Costs, And Bilateral Trade, Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 417-450.
- Ducruet C. & Van der Horst, M.R. (2009). Transport Integration at European Ports: Measuring the Role and Position of Intermediaries, European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research (forthcoming).
- Ducruet, C. (2008). World typology of port-city relationships, Cybergeo, 417,
- Fleming, D.K. (2000). A Geographical Perspective of the Transshipment Function, International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2(3), 163-176.
- Frémont, A. (2005). Conteneurisation Et Mondialisation. Les logiques des armements de lignes régulières, Texte d'Habilitation àDiriger les Recherches, Université Paris I Sorbonne, Paris.
- Frémont, A. & Soppé, M. (2005). Transport maritime conteneurisé et mondialisation, Annales de Géographie, 642, 187-200. 19
- Helmick, J.S. (1994) Concentration and Connectivity in the North Atlantic Liner Port Network, Miami: University of Miami.
- Joly, O. (1999) La Structuration des Réseaux de Circulation Maritime, Unpublished PhD dissertation in Territorial Planning, Le Havre: Le Havre University.
- Lesser, C., & E. Moise-Leeman. (2009). Informal Cross-Border Trade and Trade Facilitation Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper 86, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
- Njiwa, D., T. Nthambi & Chirwa, J. (2011). Reconnaissance Survey Report of Informal Cross-Border Trade at STR Implementing Borders of Zambia, Malawi and Zimbabwe. Unpublished report prepared by the CBT/ REFORM project team. Lusaka: COMESA Secretariat.
- Notteboom, T.E. & Rodrigue, J.P. (2005). Port Regionalization: Towards A New Phase in Port Development, Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297-313.
- Paris, N.D. (2012). Informal Cross Border Trade: Challenges and Opportunities - A Case of COMESA and its STR Implementing Borders. Lusaka: COMESA Secretariat.
- Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Chain Systems: the New Paradigm, Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 241-255.
- Slack, B. (1993). Pawns in the game: ports in a global transportation system, Growth and Change, 24(4), 579-588.
- Slack, B. (2007.) The Terminalization of Ports: An Academic Question? Paper presented at the International Workshop on New Generation Port Cities and their Insertion in Global Supply Chains, Hong Kong, 12-14.
- Starr, J.T. (1994). The mid-Atlantic load centre: Baltimore or Hampton Roads? Maritime Policy and Management, 21(3), 219-227.
- Tiezzi, S. (2014). China, Pakistan Flesh Out New Economic Corridor, The Diplomat (Tokyo). 23.
- Vigarié, A. (1995). La Mer et la Géostratégie des Nations, Paris: Economica & Institut de Stratégie Comparée.
- Wilmsmeier, G. & Hoffmann, J. (2008). Liner shipping connectivity and port infrastructure as determinants of freight rates in the Caribbean, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1-2), 130-151.
Abstrict
Gwadar Port is the mega project of ongoing developmental projects in Balochistan which is shaping the economy of the World. The port is creating opportunities and possibilities for promoting regional and international shipping and it will resuscitate trade links between China and CARs being the closest route to warm waters. Gwadar Port has vast region to influence; stretching up to several breakaway states of the former Soviet Union in the north, to Iran, the Gulf, the Middle East and East Africa in the west, to India and Sri Lanka in the south. Moreover, this deep port is serving the Gulf and East African ports with fast feeder services. It has deep-water sea complementary to Karachi and Bin Qasim ports for enhancing cargo shipments and therefore it will be a mother port for Asia in the coming years.
Keywords
Balochistan, Sea, Gwadar Port, CARs, CPEC, Natural Resources, Geostrategic
Introduction
Gwadar, the deep seaport, is so strategically located that it provides Pakistan with a foothold in the Arabian Sea as well as in the Indian Ocean. If the Persian Gulf and surrounding areas are critically assessed, the whole region is shaped like a tube, wide at the top and narrow at the bottom. (Martin, 2009, pp. 23-30) The wide top area of the tube depicts Central Asia and China; however, the narrow bottom area of the tube depicts Afghanistan and Pakistan ending at Gwadar Port and, therefore, futuristically, this becomes the economic tube of the region. This port provides an opportunity for Pakistan to control the global energy corridor and if need be, interdict tankers in the Persian Gulf. (Lim, 2017, pp. 43-50). The potential of Gwadar and surrounding areas could not be realized in the past due to lack of knowledge about the benefits of the deep seaport, political will and more importantly lack of resources. In 1964, this area was recognized as a platform for a port and in 1983, the National Engineering Services of Pakistan conducted a survey for the port feasibility (Sial, 2014, pp. 32-46) .
In 1993, the Govt of Pakistan directed a feasibility report for the construction of Gwadar Port. After seeing the geo-economic indispensability, the Asian Development Bank contemplated controlling the trade of CARs and regional trade. Due to this interest in the Asian Development Bank, the project got its impetus (Hancock, 2017, pp. 56-76). Initially, KPT and PQ were fulfilling the requirements of the growing volume of trade of Pakistan with a few limitations like having a long turnaround time and located far from the main shipping route. Gwadar Port was figured out to be the viable port choice in the entire region (Mangi & Haider, 2015, pp. 34-46). With subsequent infrastructural development, Gwadar Port will provide all kinds of services to include trans-shipment to all type of ships, facilities like warehouses and other facilities for conducting of trading activities with as many as 15 to 22 countries to include CARs, Gulf States, Iran, China, Afghanistan, Africa and countries of Red Sea region.
The Importance of Sea viz-a-viz Gwadar Port:
A well-acknowledged fact to know that three-quarters of the earth’s surface is covered by Sea. Mostly populated cities of the world are located within two hundred km of Shorelines. Out of the total world’s population, 53 percent live within 200 km of Sea. The remaining 40 percent live within 100 km and this number will grow to 75 percent by the year 2050 (Muhammad & Qi, 2015, pp. 21-32). Pakistan has been blessed with a 1,100 km long coastline, out of which there are 771 km of coastline of Balochistan. 9.1 percent of Pakistan’s population is living within a hundred km of Sea. Keeping in view these figures, Sea offers huge networking potential which helps in bestowing accessibility to the world communication centers (Tangredi, 2004, p. 656). In addition, Seas have a historical perspective to the extent of the revival of civilization on shorelines. Those nations who live near the coastlines are much more prosperous and dominant than the others (Memoona et al., 2014, pp. 53-65).
Pakistan’s coastline presents many sites with the potential to be converted into full-fledged Ports. Gwadar area has that situation in the inlet of the Persian Gulf. This area holds a strategically important position in respect of CARs and the Persian Gulf (Ghauri, 2006, pp. 41-65). Pakistan’s dependency on KPT and PQ can be seen from the fact that it conducts its 95 percent of trading activities through these two ports. Both these ports are performing at their full capacity and with growing days the trade volume will increase manifold. To be able to take care of the hinterland trading requirements and another growing volume of trade of CARs etc a new port was required to be developed in the Gwadar area. However, a congenial environment will help in revisiting the trading activities of CARs and Afghanistan. This friendly environment will serve Gwadar as a gateway and hub for trade in rumbling the region (Butt, 2007, pp. 125-140) .
There are a number of advantages of Gwadar port including strategic, geographic and economic advantages; it provides a direct and short route to China, Afghanistan, and Central Asia; more secure from India as compared to KPT and PQ; it would act as a Naval base if required; located far from any Indian interception and it can be used as a listening post to provide early warning about international sea routes (Javaid & Jahangir, 2015, pp. 63-75). Gwadar port will take care of Pakistan’s concerns due to which Pakistan’s development was greatly hindered. The significance of Gwadar can be judged by the fact that it is located in the vicinity of the Persian Gulf which is heavily used for transportation of oil to the rest of the world (Ali, 2004, pp. 218-230).
In addition to oil, trade for marketplaces of Asia Pacific, South Asian and East Asian, Gwadar port would also be a logical option in assessing oil trade in the future in relation to international sea routes (Khan, 2018, pp. 85-93). Viewing the significance of Gwadar Port, this port was contemplated to be the port for the future for worldwide investors in a conference held for FTZ, Enterprise Zone and Science and Technology Parks (Haider, 2007, pp. 34-45). To achieve the accruable benefits, it is of paramount importance to work heavily for the improvement of law and order situation in the area; creating a corruption-free environment; devising a mechanism for correct governmental decisions; improving political stability in the country and pinpointing profitable areas for future employment.
Need for a New Commercial Port:
95 percent of Pakistan’s trade is being conducted through Sea. In 2005, the total trade volume is approximately 39 million tons for which Pakistan was previously depending on KPT and PQ. Out of which 63 % is carried through KPT and 32 % are being taken care of by PQ. Since there will be a rise in the trade volume of up to 100 million tons in the year 2019, therefore, trading activities at ports will be increased phenomenally (Malik, 2012, pp. 57-60). Forecasting the future requirements of sea trade viz-a-viz the housing capacity of the existing ports it was envisaged to construct a new port. Due to this, Pakistan would be able to fulfil the future domestic requirements as well as taking care of international cargo from and to China, CARs and Gulf linked countries of the world. (Tariq & Waqar, 2014, pp. 23-31)
For commissioning a new port in the inventory, eight sites along the coastline including Keti Bander, Somani, Hingol, Ormara, Khor Kalmet, Pasni, Gwadar and Jiwani were surveyed (Malik, 2012, pp. 67-79). After critical assessment, Gwadar was selected as the best due to its enormous advantages over the others. On a comparative basis, there was less cost of the project because of the rocky surface - fewer efforts were required to dredging, the area is spacious enough to extend, trans-shipment would be much easy as the port is located close to Sea Main Route, it is located far away from India - in case of air threat, early-warning time to react and the site provides weather protection (Hassan, 2013, p. 67). Gwadar Port was constructed at a cost of USD $248 million by a Chinese firm to begin the project on 22 March 2002. Phase I was completed in December 2006 and inaugurated by the Ex-President of Pakistan, General Musharraf on 20 March 2007 (Ali, 2016, pp. 34-56).
An initial survey of Gwadar was conducted twenty-five years ago before finally the decision on the fate of the project was to be taken. The importance of the project is well acknowledged because of its location for obvious reasons; to get hold of the natural resources of CARs and the Persian Gulf (Shehzad, 2018, pp. 45-53). The prevailing situation in the region and growing demand to have multiple energy resources, the world is mesmerizing towards the resources of CARs and Pakistan has been bestowed upon the opportunity to get the trading shares from CARs resources and the Arabian Gulf region (Anwar, 2013, pp. 91-99). Gwadar port will be acting as Hub Port for handling the trading activities of CARs and Asia alike as well as the trading requirements of the hinterland. This kind of trading activity is much required for revival of the economy of not only Pakistan but for the entire region if executed properly.
To undertake the project, no other donor was available except China including its skilled manpower. Chinese are also involved in constructing other allied facilities like requisite infrastructures and industrial units; however, the presence of China is seen with concerns by India, Iran and the US (Ahmad & Hong, 2017, pp. 58-87). In the South Asian context, Pakistan and India are always head-on with each other on various issues including the core issue of Jammu and Kashmir. On the other hand, Iran is trying hard for a dominant position in the regional affairs. Afghanistan is a country that gets top priority as in all the probabilities the inflow of natural resources of CARs has to pass through it to Gwadar port (Hameed, 2018, pp. 76-89).
Afghanistan is facing insurgency and unless the situation is improved, nothing is the sight as far as the natural resources of CARs are concerned. Strategically no country is ready to accept the presence of China in the Indian Ocean. One can make out why Chinese are targeted in Pakistan who are involved in different projects in Pakistan, merely because of the triangular confluence situation in the region (Malik, 2012, pp. 27-43). To support the democratic process especially in the Middle East, the US has created troubled relations with her old allies in the Muslim World. To safeguard its interests, the US has already kept potent forces in the region. Whenever the US restructures its forces in the region, to follow its strategy of Asia-Pacific etc, they may require a naval base in the nearby location of the Arabian Gulf (Ahmad & Hong, 2017, pp. 48-83).
After giving the operational rights to the Chinese Company, COPHC, the possibility of asking Pakistan for Gwadar Port is very low but if materialized this will surely trigger uproar in Chinese circles (Blumenthal, 2013, pp. 231-295). As a result of this Pakistan will be facing rather a difficult situation. All the domestic ports of Pakistan are very close to the Indian bases therefore these ports could be easily compromised as happened in 1971 (Akhtar, 2003, p. 67). The Gwadar Port project was the call of the day for taking good care of all its vulnerabilities related to Sea. In all of the probabilities, Pakistan should avail of the existing economic opportunities and its economic revival.
Table 1. Forecast of Pakistan’s Trade
| Category (Million Tons) width="102" valign="top">2010 width="136" valign="top">2015 | > Dry Cargo width="102" valign="top">4.75 width="136" valign="top">5.78 | > Liquid Cargo width="102" valign="top">17.55 width="136" valign="top">18.78 | > Container (1,000 TEUs) width="102" valign="top">242 width="136" valign="top">296 | > Trans-shipment (1,000 TEUs) width="102" valign="top">251 width="136" valign="top">301 | > Total (Million Tons) width="102" valign="top">28.19 width="136" valign="top">31.70 |
| Category width="138" valign="top">2010 width="151" valign="top">2015 | > Dry Cargo (MT) width="138" valign="top">4.74 width="151" valign="top">5.77 | > Liquid Cargo (MT) width="138" valign="top">17.54 width="151" valign="top">18.77 | > Container (1000 TEUs) width="138" valign="top">241 width="151" valign="top">295 | > Trans-shipment (1000 TEUs) width="138" valign="top">250 width="151" valign="top">300 | > Total (MT) width="138" valign="top">28.17 width="151" valign="top">31.68 |
