An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi
China and India celebrated their embryonic relations with a documented modus vivendi i.e. “The Panchsheel Agreement”. This concord highlighted five principles of peaceful coexistence between India and China. The Tibet region was the nucleus of this agreement. Nevertheless, after four years of its celebration, eyebrows raised from both sides in 1959 when China started its unification process and India welcomed the Dalai Lama, a separatist leader of the Tibetan region. This caused bitterness between India and China and both the states reversed to their retrospective modus operandi, which later on graduated into a full-fledged war between the two countries in 1962. Despite their limited modus vivendi in the 21st century, both the states tend more towards their intrinsic modus operandi. This analytical study is discussing the Sino-Indian relations through the lenses of Modus vivendi and Modus operandi and its implication for Pakistan.
-
Sino-Indian Geo-strategic competition, Modus Vivendi, Modus Operandi, Synergy
-
(1) Asghar Ali
PhD Scholar,Department of Political Science & International Relations, Qurtaba University of Science & IT, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(2) Nazim Rahim
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science & International Relations,Qurtaba University of Science & IT, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra
PhD Scholar,Department of Political Science,Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Ahlawat, D., & Hughes, L. (2018). India-China Stand-off in Doklam: Aligning Realism with National Characteristics. The Round Table, 107(5), 613-625.
- Aljazeera. (2019). UN Security Council to meet on Kashmir on China's request. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/security-council-meet-kashmir-china- request191217032517001.html
- Awan, Z.A. (2019). Alice Wells Remarks on CPEC are worth considerations. Geopolitica.ur. Retrieved from https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/alice-wells- remarks-cpec-are-worthconsiderations
- Bley, B. (2019). The New Geography of Global Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-11-27/new-geography-globaldiplomacy
- Britannica Encyclopedia. (2014a). Malacca, Strait of. Encyclopedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.
- Britannica Encyclopedia. (2014b). Spice trade. Encyclopedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.
- Congress Research Service. (2018). China-India Great Power Competition in the Indian Ocean Region: Issues for Congress. Retrieved from https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20180420_R45194_3d4bf676130e76924f5fea 6d2e5 4d3a78e2200a9.pdf
- Das, R.N. (2011). Sino-Indian Relations: Contours and Contents. Jindal Journal of International Affairs 1(1), 259-268.
- Das, S. (2014). The Sino-Indian Border Dispute: what role for the European Union? European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS) Briefing Paper, EIAS: Brussels, 3
- Dawn. (2016, May 23). Iran, India, Afghanistan sign transit accord on Chabahar port. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/1260176
- Einhorn, R., & Sidhu, W. P. S. (2017). The strategic chain linking Pakistan, India, China, and the United States. Brookings Institution.
- Frankopan, P. (2018). The New Silk Roads: The Present and Future of the World. Bloomsbury Publishing
- Gettleman, J., Raj, S., Schultz, K., & Kumar, H. (2019). India Revokes Kashmir's Special Status, Raising Fear of Unrest. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/world/asia/india-pakistan-kashmir-jammu.html
- Gilpin, R. (2016). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
- India.com. (2017). What is Panchsheel Pact? All You Need to Know. Retrieved from https://www.india.com/news/india/what-is-panchsheel-pact-all-you-need-to-know2298469/
- qbal, A. (2016). US-Indian defense pact to impact Pakistan, China. Dawn. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/1280873
- Iqbal, M. Z., & Amin, M. (2016). Vacillation between Soft and Hard Balancing: China- Pakistan versus Indo-US Strategies. Strategic Studies, 36(1).
- Jaipragas, B. (2017). Why is the US calling Asia-Pacific the Indo-Pacific? Donald Trump to 'clarify'. This Week in Asia. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/weekasia/politics/article/2118806/why-us-calling-asia-pacific-indo-pacific-trump-clarify
- Jiangtao, S., & Zhou, L. (2017). Wary China on 'Quad' bloc watch after officials from US, Japan, India and Australia meet on Asean sidelines. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy- defence/article/2119719/wary-chinaquad-bloc-watch-after-officials-us-japan
- Joseph, J. (2018). What is the Doklam issue all about? The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/what-is-the-doklam-issue-allabout/article22536937.ece
- Kazmi, S. (2017). Opposition to CPEC: A lost cause for India. Foreign Policy News. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicynews.org/2017/08/29/opposition-cpec-lost-cause-india/
- Kenny, S. (2015). China and India: A New Great Game founded on historic mistrust and current competition. Centre for Defense and Strategic Studies, 1-20.
- Khan, I. (2019, September 27). PM Imran Khan Complete Speech at UN General Assembly [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ215CrOXEE
- Lal, R. (2006). Understanding China and India: Security implications for the United States and the world. Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Luk, U. H. (2016). Strategic ambiguities in Indian nuclear doctrine: Implications for Pakistan's security. Institute of Policy Studies Islamabad, Policy perspective, 13(1), 5-23.
- Mahan, A. T. (2011). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783. Read Books Ltd.
- Mark, J.J. (2012. Ancient China. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.ancient.eu/china/
- Myers, S.L., Barry, E., & Fisher, M. (2017). How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.htm
- Nadeem, M. (2018). IS GWADAR THE ANSWER TO CHINA'S MALACCA DILEMMA? Gwadar Central. Retrieved from https://gwadarcentral.com/is-gwadar-the-answer-to-chinas-malacca-dilemma/
- Pandit. R.(2015). India reclaims spice route to counter China's silk route. Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-reclaims-spice-route- to-counter-Chinassilk-route/articleshow/49915610.cms?from=mdr
- Siddiqi, F. H. (2012). India-China Relations in the 21 st Century: Impact on Regional and Global Politics. Pakistan Horizon, 65(2), 59-72.
- Storey, I. (2006). China's Malacca Dilemma. The Jamestown Foundation, Global Research & Analysis. Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-malacca-dilemma/
- The Economic Times. (2016). Sagarmala project to be completed in 5 years. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/infrastructure/sagarmalaproject-to-be-completed-in-5-years/articleshow/51826345.cms?from=mdr
- The Indian Express. (2016, September 29). SAARC summit postponed after India's boycott: reports. Retrieved from http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/saarc- summitpostponed-after-indias-boycott-3054721/
- The Times of India. (2018, March 07). India-China bilateral trade hits historical high of $84.44 billion in 2017. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-chinabilateral-trade-hits-historic- high-of-84-44-billion-in-2017/article show/63202401.cms
- Thubron, C. (2012). Shadow of the Silk Road. Random House.
- Toppa, S. (2018). Why Young Pakistanis and Learning Chinese. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/11/pakistan-china-cooperationcpec/568750/
- Trumbull, R. (1979). India's Visit to China Cut Off in Protest. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1979/02/19/archives/indians-visit-to-china-cut-off-inprotest- demonstrations-planned.html
- World Bank. (2018). Belt and Road Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
- Zhang, H., & Li, M. (2013). Sino-Indian border disputes. ISPI, Analysis, (181), 1-9.
Cite this article
-
APA : Ali, A., Rahim, N., & Sipra, G. H. A. (2018). An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi. Global Political Review, III(I), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03
-
CHICAGO : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. 2018. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III (I): 24-32 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03
-
HARVARD : ALI, A., RAHIM, N. & SIPRA, G. H. A. 2018. An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi. Global Political Review, III, 24-32.
-
MHRA : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. 2018. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III: 24-32
-
MLA : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review, III.I (2018): 24-32 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ali, Asghar, Rahim, Nazim, and Sipra, Ghulam Hussain Abid (2018), "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi", Global Political Review, III (I), 24-32
-
TURABIAN : Ali, Asghar, Nazim Rahim, and Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra. "An Analysis of Sino-Indian Relations: Modus Operandi or Modus Vivendi." Global Political Review III, no. I (2018): 24-32. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2018(III-I).03