ARTICLE

INTERACTIVE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS AND HIERARCHICAL STATUS ON WORKPLACE VICTIMIZATION

04 Pages : 29-40

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).04      10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).04      Published : Dec 2019

Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization

    Drawing upon deviant place theory, we examined the role of organizational politics in workplace victimization considering the moderating effect of employees hierarchical status in the context of higher educational institutions in Pakistan. Data was collected from 313 employees holding various positions in the teaching faculty of selected universities in Lahore. The survey instrument consisted of existing validated scales to measure the proposed variable; the same were also found consistently reliable in this study. We performed correlation, simple regression, and multiple regression analyses to test hypotheses. Organizational politics indicated to be a strongly positive associate of workplace victimization. The moderated model explained significant variance in workplace victimization indicating that victimization initiated by organizational politics varied with the positional status that the victim holds in the hierarchy. We suggest that a political climate should be discouraged to prevent negative outcomes of victimization at work.

    Organizational politics, employee status, workplace victimization
    (1) Amna Gul
    Student,Department of Business Administration,Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Farooq Ahmad
    Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management Science, SZABIST, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan.
    (3) Shahida Mariam
    Librarian,Department of Business & Commerce,Government Institute of Commerce, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Alias, M., & Rasdi, R. M. (2015). Organizational predictors of workplace deviance among support staff. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(1), 126-133.
  • Amponsah-Tawiah, K., & Annor, F. (2017). Do personality and organizational politics predict workplace victimization? A study among Ghanaian employees. Safety and Health at Work, 8(1), 72-76.
  • An, Y., & Kang, J. (2016).Relationship between organizational culture and workplace bullying among Korean nurses. Asian nursing research, 10(3), 234-239.
  • Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26(2), 171-193.
  • Aquino, K., &Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual review of psychology, 60, 717-741.
  • Aquino, K., Galperin, B. L., & Bennett, R. J. (2004).Social status and aggressiveness as moderators of the relationship between interactional justice and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 1001-1029.
  • Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. (1999).The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of management journal, 42(3), 260-272.
  • Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 14(2), 126-140.
  • Ash-Houchen, W., & Lo, C. C. (2018). Intersections of gender and sexual minority status: Co-occurring bullying victimization among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 262-270.
  • Balducci, C., Alfano, V., &Fraccaroli, F. (2009). Relationships between mobbing at work and MMPI-2 personality profile, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and suicidal ideation and behavior. Violence and Victims, 24(1), 52-67.
  • Balducci, C., Cecchin, M., &Fraccaroli, F. (2012). The impact of role stressors on workplace bullying in both victims and perpetrators, controlling for personal vulnerability factors: A longitudinal analysis. Work & Stress, 26(3), 195-212.
  • Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(3), 161-173.
  • Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(2), 410.
  • Braithwaite, V., Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). Workplace bullying and victimization: The influence of organizational context, shame, and pride. International Journal of OrganisationalBehaviour, 13(2), 71-94.
  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact. Journal of occupational health psychology, 6(1), 64-80.
  • Cortina, L. M., Rabelo, V. C., & Holland, K. J. (2018). Beyond blaming the victim: Toward a more progressive understanding of workplace mistreatment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 81-100.
  • Dash, S. S., & Jena, L. K. (2019). Self-deception, emotional neglect, and workplace victimization. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 13(1), 81-94.
  • Drory, A. (1993). Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organization Studies, 14(1), 59-71.
  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331-351.
  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2003). Individual Effects of Exposure to Bullying at Work. In Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace (pp. 127-144). Taylor & Francis.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., &Notelaers, G. (2009).Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts QuestionnaireRevised.Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Baal, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice, 2, 3-40.
  • Ferris, G.R., et al. (1996). Perceptions of Organizational Politics: prediction, stress-related implications, and outcomes. Human Relations, 49(2), 233-266.
  • French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959).The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 7, 311-320.
  • Hackney, K. J., & Perrewé, P. L. (2018). A review of abusive behaviors at work: The development of a process model for studying abuse. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(1), 70-92.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Hansen, Å. M., Grynderup, M. B., Bonde, J. P., Conway, P. M., Garde, A. H., Kaerlev, L., ... & Willert, M. (2018). Does workplace bullying affect long-term sickness absence among coworkers? Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 60(2), 132-137.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regressionbased approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Hoffmann, J. P. (2010). Linear regression analysis: applications and assumptions. Brigham Young University, Provo.
  • Hourani, L. L., Williams, J., Lattimore, P. K., Morgan, J. K., Hopkinson, S. G., Jenkins, L., & Cartwright, J. (2018). Workplace victimization risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior among active duty military personnel. Journal of affective disorders, 236, 45-51.
  • Itzkovich, Y. (2014). Incivility: The Moderating Effect of Hierarchical Status Does a Manager Inflict More Damage. Journal of Management Research, 6(3), 86-98.
  • Jia, J., Li, D., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, L. (2018). Peer victimization and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological security and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 116-124.
  • Johan Hauge, L., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study. Work & Stress, 21(3), 220-242.
  • Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple sample investigation. Journal of Management, 23(5), 627-658.
  • Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of emotional abuse, 1(1), 85-117.
  • Lambert, E. G., Gordon, J., Paoline III, E. A., & Hogan, N. L. (2018). Workplace demands and resources as antecedents of jail officer perceived danger at work. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 98-118.
  • Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179-188.
  • Lane, J., Armstrong, G. S., & Fox, K. A. (2018). Fear of victimization among incarcerated youths: Examining the effects of institutional https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18764522
  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(2), 165-184.
  • Martín Babarro, J., Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez Arias, R., & Steglich, C. (2017). The power structure in the peer group: The role of classroom cohesion and hierarchy in peer acceptance and rejection of victimized and aggressive students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(9), 1197-1220.
  • Martin, R. J., & Hine, D. W. (2005). Development and validation of the uncivil workplace behavior questionnaire. Journal of occupational health psychology, 10(4), 477.
  • Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8, 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/r222- hv23
  • Qaisar, M. N., Malik, T. N. (2015). Determinants of Employee Health and Happiness: A Wellness Perceptive from Islamic and General Point of View at Public Sector Organizations in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Al-Idah, 31(2), 84-103.
  • Qaisar, M. N., Mariam, S., & Ahmad, F. (2018). Employee wellness as predictor of productivity from public sector management perspectives: Conditional Process Analysis. NUML International Journal of Business & Management, 13(2), 104-116.
  • Ravenswood, K., Douglas, J., & Haar, J. (2017). Physical and verbal abuse, work demands, training and job satisfaction amongst aged-care employees in the home and community sector. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 27(4), 302-318.
  • Rubineau, B., Lim, Y., & Neblo, M. (2019). Low status rejection: How status hierarchies influence negative tie formation. Social Networks, 56, 33-44.
  • Salin, D. (2003). Bullying and organizational politics in competitive and rapidly changing work environments. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4(1), 35-46.
  • Salin, D. (2005). Workplace bullying among business professionals: Prevalence, gender differences and the role of organizational politics. Perspectives interdiscipliconairessur le travail et la santé, (7-3). https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.3159
  • Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Beauty, Personality, and Affect as Antecedents of Counterproductive Work Behavior Receipt. Human Performance, 26(2), 93-113.
  • Siegel, L. (2006). Criminology. (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth
  • Tepper, B.J. (2007).Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations; Review synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 878-893.
  • Thatcher, J. B., Wright, R. T., Sun, H., Zagenczyk, T. J., & Klein, R. (2018). Mindfulness in Information Technology Use: Definitions, Distinctions, and a New Measure. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 831-847.
  • Trépanier, S. G., Fernet, C., Austin, S., &Boudrias, V. (2016). Work environment antecedents of bullying: A review and integrative model applied to registered nurses. International journal of nursing studies, 55, 85-97.
  • Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual review of psychology, 58, 425-452.

Cite this article

    APA : Gul, A., Ahmad, F., & Mariam, S. (2019). Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization. Global Political Review, IV(IV), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).04
    CHICAGO : Gul, Amna, Farooq Ahmad, and Shahida Mariam. 2019. "Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization." Global Political Review, IV (IV): 29-40 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).04
    HARVARD : GUL, A., AHMAD, F. & MARIAM, S. 2019. Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization. Global Political Review, IV, 29-40.
    MHRA : Gul, Amna, Farooq Ahmad, and Shahida Mariam. 2019. "Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization." Global Political Review, IV: 29-40
    MLA : Gul, Amna, Farooq Ahmad, and Shahida Mariam. "Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization." Global Political Review, IV.IV (2019): 29-40 Print.
    OXFORD : Gul, Amna, Ahmad, Farooq, and Mariam, Shahida (2019), "Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization", Global Political Review, IV (IV), 29-40
    TURABIAN : Gul, Amna, Farooq Ahmad, and Shahida Mariam. "Interactive Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics and Hierarchical Status on Workplace Victimization." Global Political Review IV, no. IV (2019): 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).04