Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)
This research explores British educational policies in India (1835–1947) as ideological tools that reinforced administrative control and cultural dominance. Focusing on Macaulay’s Minute (1835), Wood’s Dispatch (1854), and the Indian Universities Act (1904), it analyzes their impact on native institutions, language hierarchies, and socio-economic systems. Using historical document analysis, thematic analysis, and critical discourse analysis, the study identifies four lasting colonial patterns: cultural alienation, linguistic hierarchy, educational elitism, and bureaucratic utility. Policies promoted English superiority through a civilized/barbaric dichotomy, suppressing indigenous knowledge. The colonial agenda aimed to create a loyal clerical class and hinder native intellectual growth. These legacies persist through centralized control, outsider language dominance, and biased curricula. The paper concludes with recommendations to decolonize education by embracing indigenous knowledge and multilingualism to foster epistemic justice in postcolonial contexts.
-
Colonial Education, Macaulay’s Minute, Indigenous Knowledge, Critical Discourse Analysis, Educational Inequality, Linguistic Hierarchy, Postcolonial Reform
-
(1) Muhammad Sajid
PhD Scholar, Department of History, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Mazher Hussain
Associate Professor, Department of History, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
-
Bhatnagar, R. (2011). Gender, caste, and education in colonial India: The case of indigenous female schools in 19th-century Bengal. Paedagogica Historica, 47(1–2), 117–133.
- Caruso, M. (2022). The De-Subalternization of the Knowledge of Education? Lecturing Pedagogic Knowledge in Colonial India (approx. 1840–1882). Nordic Journal of Educational History, 9(2), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v9i2.270
- Chaudhary, L. (2009). Determinants of primary schooling in British India. The Journal of Economic History, 69(1), 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050709000400
- Chaudhary, L., & Garg, M. (2015). Railways, incentives, and the origins of mass education in India. Social Science History, 39(3), 311–338.
- Ellis, C. (2009). Education for All: Reassessing the historiography of education in Colonial India. History Compass, 7(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00564.x
- Ghosh, S. C. (1995). Bentinck, Macaulay and the introduction of English education in India. History of Education, 24(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760950240102
- Islam, M. N. (2009). English education and Indian nationalism: A historical review of Macaulay’s legacy. South Asia Research, 29(3), 237–255.
- Kumar, K. (2005). Macaulay and the legacy of English education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(22), 2270–2275.
- Majeed, J. (2009). British colonialism in India as a pedagogical enterprise. History and Theory, 48(4), 67–83.
- Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Yusoff, K. (2024). British colonial education in the Indian Subcontinent (1757-1858): Attitude of Muslims. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.02
- Mondal, A. (2017). Free and compulsory primary education in India under the British Raj: a tale of an unfulfilled dream. SAGE Open, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017727037
- Raman, A. (2010). The Macaulay effect: English education and socioeconomic change in colonial India. Journal of South Asian Development, 5(1), 37–60.
- Rao, P. V. (2025). Geopolitics, the British education policy in India, and Indian response 1780–1947. Paedagogica Historica, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2025.2453975
- Sen, S. (2010). Disciplining the boys: The Indian public school, race and the British Empire. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 38(3), 405–427.
- Sen, S. N. (2011). From Orientalism to Anglicism: Evaluating Macaulay’s Minute and Wood’s Despatch in shaping Indian education (1835–1854). Indian Economic and Social History Review, 48(4), 555–572.
- Sethy, S. S. (2019). Colonial education and its lasting impact on Indian higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 6(2), 115–131.
- Suman, A. K. (2014). Indigenous educational institutions in Upper Gangetic Valley: Curriculum, structure and patronage. Social Scientist, 42(3–4), 45–57.
- Suman, A. K. (2018). The quest for education: An insight into the educational theories and practices of the colonial government in Bengal Presidency. Indian Historical Review, 45(2), 242–260.
- Whitehead, C. (2005). The historiography of British imperial education policy, Part I: India. History of Education, 34(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600500065340
Cite this article
-
APA : Sajid, M., & Hussain, M. (2025). Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947). Global Political Review, X(I), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2025(X-I).07
-
CHICAGO : Sajid, Muhammad, and Mazher Hussain. 2025. "Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)." Global Political Review, X (I): 75-88 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2025(X-I).07
-
HARVARD : SAJID, M. & HUSSAIN, M. 2025. Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947). Global Political Review, X, 75-88.
-
MHRA : Sajid, Muhammad, and Mazher Hussain. 2025. "Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)." Global Political Review, X: 75-88
-
MLA : Sajid, Muhammad, and Mazher Hussain. "Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)." Global Political Review, X.I (2025): 75-88 Print.
-
OXFORD : Sajid, Muhammad and Hussain, Mazher (2025), "Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)", Global Political Review, X (I), 75-88
-
TURABIAN : Sajid, Muhammad, and Mazher Hussain. "Educational Policies and Colonial Legacy: A Historical Analysis of Successes and Failures (1835-1947)." Global Political Review X, no. I (2025): 75-88. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2025(X-I).07