Hybrid Warfare and the Challenges to the Conduct of Intelligence

doi:10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02

Hybrid Warfare and the Challenges to the Conduct of Intelligence

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02
Authored by :

02 Pages : 9-16

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02 10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02

Hybrid Warfare and the Challenges to the Conduct of Intelligence

Abstract

The character of warfare has remained constant however its nature has been changing from time to time over the last twenty years. The traditional definition of warfare, explaining an exceptionally coordinated and prepared involvement of powers in the conflict, such as the Second World War, have become old fashioned and irrelevant. The Intelligence operations were moderately clear and defined through the Cold War era. There were two defined adversaries, both were superpowers, and existential dangers to public safety, both political and military (counting atomic), were generally straightforward. Indeed, even psychological warfare was 'less complex' as it was focused on a targeted audience and state associations utilizing strategies were notable. The post- 9/11 world is facing new and complex difficulties especially with regards to nature of warfare which has become Hybrid as well as countering techniques in terms of Intelligence operations.

https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2021(VI-II).02

Hybrid Warfare and the Challenges to the Conduct of Intelligence

Hybrid Warfare and the Challenges to the Conduct of Intelligence

Abstract

Keywords

Authors

References

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

HARVARD

MHRA

MLA

OXFORD

TURABIAN