ARTICLE

REPUGNANCY TO ISLAMIC INJUNCTIONS ANALYSIS AND LEGITIMACY OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ORDINANCE 1999

03 Pages : 17 - 22

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2022(VII-II).03      10.31703/gpr.2022(VII-II).03      Published : Jun 2022

Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999

    This article encompasses an analysis of provisions of NAB 1999 on the touchstone of their conformity with the injunctions of the Quran and Sunnah. The argument advanced in this respect is based on Article 203(d) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, under which FSC is vested with the power of examining and deciding questions of law tainted to be contrary to the injunctions of the Quran and Sunnah. Arguments made in this paper challenge Section 9(a)(iv) and Section 14(c) and (d) which are not in consonance with the injunctions of Islam, as appeared in the Quran and Sunnah. Pakistan's Islamic identity necessitates such questions pertaining to un-Islamic provisions in the laws of Pakistan always yielded debates and different opinions of scholars. Analysis of the NAB ordinance and its provisions discussed in the paper, which does not conform to the injunctions of Islam would inform and invoke legislators to reform legislation in Pakistan.

    National Accountability Ordinance 1999, Islamic Injunctions, Law Reforms, Right of Fair Trial
    (1) Aamir Abbas
    Assistant Professor, College of Law, Government College University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Atika Lohani
    Assistant Professor, College of Law, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Samza Fatima
    Associate Professor, Law, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • National Accountability Ordinance 1999
  • The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • UN's Universal Declaration on human rights Awdah 'Abd al Qadir, nd, section, 183
  • The state v Anwar Saif Ullah Khan PLD, 2008 SC, page 166,
  • Olas khan , NAB thr. Its Chairman and others v Chairman NAB thr.its chairman and other Shahibzada Alamgir , PLD 2001 SC 607), (SCMR 2008,1118
  • PLD 2004,Quetta,136), SCMR 2009,790.
  • Syed Ali Nawaz Gardezi v Lt.Col. Muhammad Yousaf , PLD 1963SC 51.
  • Brown , Daniel 1996, Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought , Cambridge University Press
  • Nyazee Imran Ahsan khan 2005, ''Outlines of Islamic Jurisprudence'' third edition , Rawalpindi , Pakistan , Federal Law House , 2005)

Cite this article

    APA : Abbas, A., Lohani, A., & Fatima, S. (2022). Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999. Global Political Review, VII(II), 17 - 22. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2022(VII-II).03
    CHICAGO : Abbas, Aamir, Atika Lohani, and Samza Fatima. 2022. "Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999." Global Political Review, VII (II): 17 - 22 doi: 10.31703/gpr.2022(VII-II).03
    HARVARD : ABBAS, A., LOHANI, A. & FATIMA, S. 2022. Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999. Global Political Review, VII, 17 - 22.
    MHRA : Abbas, Aamir, Atika Lohani, and Samza Fatima. 2022. "Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999." Global Political Review, VII: 17 - 22
    MLA : Abbas, Aamir, Atika Lohani, and Samza Fatima. "Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999." Global Political Review, VII.II (2022): 17 - 22 Print.
    OXFORD : Abbas, Aamir, Lohani, Atika, and Fatima, Samza (2022), "Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999", Global Political Review, VII (II), 17 - 22
    TURABIAN : Abbas, Aamir, Atika Lohani, and Samza Fatima. "Repugnancy to Islamic Injunctions: Analysis and Legitimacy of National Accountability Ordinance 1999." Global Political Review VII, no. II (2022): 17 - 22. https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2022(VII-II).03